what about passive aggressive attacks on a person's story by editors who are flaunting their personal biases by attacking the person's story? i just had three of these in one hour tonight. i have tried to be rational and communicative with the editors, but, hey, i'm posting my stories here about flickr specifically because the people who are in control at flickr are not willing to communicate and have done inappropriate things. Jordan and Kaitlin seem to appreciate what i'm trying to do, but i have since gotten slammed (passively) by two other editors and had another item marked as spam rather casually instead of working with me to find the best solution.

 i am particularly concerned about the two editors who have a strong bias against whatever they determine is "Radical" or a "Liberal" because that's the way they treated me via the language use. Such as forking out memes intended to "down" my credibility, instead of discussing actual points inside the proper context.

i came here to make some things NOW PUBLIC because where i was previously has become viciously hostile and has demonstrated massive bias against anyone who questions their authority. i LOVED flickr. Now they have created a war and it is driven by the control of information. So, what do you do? You publish that information as wide and as far as possible.

Now i fear i'm going to get the same treatment here. People who have personal biases are going to assume i'm "one of those people" that they hate and do whatever they can to squash me out of NowPublic.com.