Add Your Photos and Video to This Story

AUSTRALIA: Email spy powers 'a licence for witch hunts'

by Maireid Sullivan | April 14, 2008 at 01:48 am

337 views | 2 Recommendations | 2 comments

Here we go again, with that fine line between good government and potential overbearing government, with the potential to spy on people's private emails  - the one and only true open source internet service we have. Our beloved Deputy Prime Minister Julia Dillard has me worried with this statement.
"So it's a national security move, not a move about an unseemly interest in people's private emails." She has sent up warning signals! Naturally, the outcome will depend on whether enough people will show they are paying attention.  What the government needs to do is talk to the Servers. They are suupposed to have secure firewalls. Maybe that is where the focus should be, not down the line at the end user.

14 April, 2008, ABC News

Civil rights groups have spoken out against a proposal for closer monitoring of email and internet use in workplaces.
The Federal Government is considering new national security laws which would allow employers to check their workers' computer use - such as emails - without the employee's consent.

Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard says critical computer networks need to be better protected against cyber attacks.

But Dale Clapperton, from the internet-rights watchdog Electronic Frontiers Australia, says it is an over-reaction.

"Our concern is, that if given these powers, they're more likely to be used for eavesdropping and corporate witch hunts rather than protecting Australia from some kind of cyber attack."

Earlier Ms Gillard defended the proposal.

"We want to make sure that they are safe from terrorist attack," she said.

"Part of doing that is making sure we've got the right powers to ensure that we can tell if there's something unusual going on in the system.

"So it's a national security move, not a move about an unseemly interest in people's private emails."

Attorney-General Robert McClelland says the changes are only being considered, but he thinks people's privacy could be protected.

"You would be looking at excluding use of personal information for any other purpose," he said.

Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis says he is concerned about giving companies the power "to act in effect as a quasi-law enforcement or investigative authority"

recommend Add a comment
Vinny
Vinny
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:24 on April 14th, 2008

Maireid Sullivan, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Maireid Sullivan

Thanks Vinnie, It dawned on me after I uploaded ths tory, that perhaps Gilliard really doesn't understand the technology, therefore may be misled by the wrong advisers.

I think I'll write a brief letter to her office.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

April 14, 2008 at 01:48 am by Maireid Sullivan, 337 views, 2 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from